The position on a single page. Why authorization for autonomous software has one final boundary, and what per-act authorization closes that identity and policy cannot.
SentoClaw provides security and enablement for autonomous workloads as two expressions of one layer: per-act authorization. Security tooling built for human-paced software does not scale to agents working at machine speed. We moved authorization to the act.
Our framework binds identity and policy so that neither half carries standing authority. Identity tells you who an agent is. Policy says what it should do. Neither can authorize what it actually does, action by action, once it's running.
SentoClaw is the layer that can.
Every protected action is checked against fresh, signed authority before it takes effect. Approved actions proceed at machine speed; anything outside the grant stops before it happens.
One action of exposure. Authority is issued per action, one action at a time — nothing standing to steal, nothing to replay. A compromised or misdirected agent is stopped at the first action outside its grant.
Enforcement sits below the protocol layer, so it covers unmodified, uncooperative tools — no SDKs, no sidecars, no framework integration. Whatever your agents speak, the actions underneath are what get authorized.
Works alongside identity providers and policy engines, with no modification to the agents or tools it protects. Deploys as software, not a rebuild.
Untrusted — the agent doesn't participate in its own policing.
Offline — the decision is local; no network dependency in the moment of enforcement.
Per-action — authority never outlives the act it was issued for.
SentoClaw's authorization is offline by design: no network call in the path of the act, and no call home to reach a verdict. Enforcement that never phones a control plane can deploy where others can't, and the same posture runs everywhere it lands.
Authority, decisions, and the evidence behind them stay inside your borders. No foreign control plane, no vendor in the loop — no jurisdiction questions riding on your security layer.
Proven on embedded-class hardware. Connectivity is optional: a device that loses the network keeps enforcing, and fails closed rather than open.
Most security assumes a cloud console. Ours never needed one — the air gap isn't a special mode, it's the posture we built first.
The same enforcement, host by host, with nothing new to depend on. Your security layer can't become your outage, and no decision waits on a round trip.
A layer that doesn't need the network to say no doesn't need the cloud to exist.
Teams running agents on infrastructure they control, who want real authority granted safely — and a direct line to the people building the enforcement layer. Early partners shape the product and deploy it first.
Talk to us about a deploymentEverything we have published, in one place.
Repeat founder. Bootstrapped his previous company to $6M ARR — a business built on understanding exactly how presentation-based security fails. SentoClaw is the defense built by someone who spent years on the offense.
M.S. Computer Science. The systems builder behind the architecture — designed, built, and proved the enforcement platform on two different processor and kernel generations, to an evidence standard built for adversarial review.
Limited design partner slots, technical deep-dives, press inquiries.
cody@sentoclaw.aiCurrently engaging by introduction.